Matt Reisener, Senior National Security Advisor at the Center for Maritime Strategy and former Senior Program Manager for the Middle East and North Africa at the National Democratic Institute, offers a clear assessment in the Jerusalem Strategic Tribune of the possible consequences of the war with Iran.
He argues that if this regime succeeds in its gamble over the Strait of Hormuz, the balance of power in the Gulf will change.
The reason is clear: the Strait of Hormuz is not only a passage. It is a bargaining chip, a legal test, and a geopolitical fault line.
Can Iran Really Control the Strait of Hormuz?
by
May 2026
Recent Articles
Are There Laws of War?
Azar Gat, Military Theory and the Conduct of War, Oxford University Press, 2025 As the ongoing conflict in Iran has made clear, war remains a stubbornly persistent part of human life, as it has been since before the beginning of recorded history. Not surprisingly, this ancient practice has inspired a large and growing body of […]
Towards a Civilizational Perception of the Jewish State
In contemporary studies of international relations, the cultural background of foreign policy has become a central analytical tool for understanding how nations and non-state actors behave on the global stage. Scholars such as Alexander Wendt, Peter Katzenstein, and Benedict Anderson have demonstrated that states do not act solely according to material interests; rather, their foreign […]
AI as the Next World Order
Artificial Intelligence is not merely the latest sector of industrial advancement. It is the architect of a new global paradigm — rapidly becoming the operating system of economy, politics, governance, and military force. The historical trajectory of human progress has always been dictated by the relationship between the tools of production and the structures of governance. The […]
