In this conversation with Jacob Heilbrunn, Eka Tkeshelashvili—former Deputy Prime Minister of Georgia and senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund—offers a strategic reading of Russia’s trajectory from 2008 to today.
She argues that the war against Georgia was not an isolated conflict, but Putin’s first “test run” — a calibrated experiment in using force against a sovereign neighbor while assessing Western resolve. Ukraine, she explains, represents the continuation and escalation of that imperial logic.
She also examines Putin’s ideological framework, including his rehabilitation of Stalin as a symbol of centralized, unchecked power. For her, the war in Ukraine is not merely territorial — it is a deliberate attempt to erase Ukrainian nationhood itself.
Finally, she urges the United States to adopt a clearer and more coherent strategy in the Black Sea region, warning that strategic ambiguity only creates space for Moscow to expand its influence.
Putin’s Imperial Strategy Through the Eyes of Eka Tkeshelashvili
by
March 2026
Recent Articles
Towards a Civilizational Perception of the Jewish State
In contemporary studies of international relations, the cultural background of foreign policy has become a central analytical tool for understanding how nations and non-state actors behave on the global stage. Scholars such as Alexander Wendt, Peter Katzenstein, and Benedict Anderson have demonstrated that states do not act solely according to material interests; rather, their foreign […]
AI as the Next World Order
Artificial Intelligence is not merely the latest sector of industrial advancement. It is the architect of a new global paradigm — rapidly becoming the operating system of economy, politics, governance, and military force. The historical trajectory of human progress has always been dictated by the relationship between the tools of production and the structures of governance. The […]
ISRAEL’S NUCLEAR DETERRENCE
CASTING A WIDER “NET”
CASTING A WIDER “NET”
Even after “Operation Roaring Lion” and America’s “Operation Epic Fury,” Israel’s presumptive nuclear weapons remain essential for deterrence of nuclear threats. There are also foreseeable circumstances in which these weapons could deter certain non-nuclear threats. Most plausible, in this connection, would be circumstances in which the enemy threats referenced large-scale conventional attacks (whether first-strike attacks […]
