In this conversation with Jacob Heilbrunn, Eka Tkeshelashvili—former Deputy Prime Minister of Georgia and senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund—offers a strategic reading of Russia’s trajectory from 2008 to today.
She argues that the war against Georgia was not an isolated conflict, but Putin’s first “test run” — a calibrated experiment in using force against a sovereign neighbor while assessing Western resolve. Ukraine, she explains, represents the continuation and escalation of that imperial logic.
She also examines Putin’s ideological framework, including his rehabilitation of Stalin as a symbol of centralized, unchecked power. For her, the war in Ukraine is not merely territorial — it is a deliberate attempt to erase Ukrainian nationhood itself.
Finally, she urges the United States to adopt a clearer and more coherent strategy in the Black Sea region, warning that strategic ambiguity only creates space for Moscow to expand its influence.
Putin’s Imperial Strategy Through the Eyes of Eka Tkeshelashvili
by
March 2026
Recent Articles
The Abraham Accords Go Eurasian
On April 27, Israeli President Isaac Herzog arrives in Astana on a state visit. It highest-level Israeli visit since that of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in December 2016 and the first such visit since Kazakhstan joined the Abraham Accords last November. Much of the commentary on Kazakhstani accession to the Accords greeted it with a […]
Russia Sanctions: A weapon that doesn’t hit hard enough
Answers in this in-depth analysis by Melinda Haring, member of the editorial board of the Jerusalem Strategic Tribune, senior advisor at Razom for Ukraine, and senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, and Dariia Skochenko, intern at Razom for Ukraine and economics student at the University of Maryland.
Iran: Survive… and Threaten the World?
If the Iranian regime survives, the threat will not disappear; it will evolve, warns Colonel (ret.) Dr. Eran Lerman.The former deputy national security adviser of Israel and vice president of the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security stresses that diplomacy remains necessary, but it cannot succeed without real pressure. In his view, the objective must […]
