This briefing draws on a major strategic essay published in the Jerusalem Strategic Tribune, where Ambassador James Jeffrey—one of the key architects of U.S. strategy over decades—delivers a clear warning: despite the intensity of the ongoing war with Iran, its outcome remains uncertain. As he notes, the region is approaching a decisive inflection point, where the future could range from a transformed Middle East to a more dangerous and radicalized Iran.
The Middle East After the Iran War: Lessons and Outcomes
by
April 2026
Recent Articles
Dr Sumantra Maitra on NATO, Iran and America’s strategic choices
Across this Atlantic Conversation with Jacob Heilbrunn, Dr Sumantra Maitra, Institute for Peace and Diplomacy Fellow and Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, delivers a clear-eyed assessment of today’s strategic order. He calls for NATO to return to its defensive purpose, urges Europe to prepare for a possible US pivot toward Asia, warns that regime […]
The Clash of Civilizations and Trump’s Foreign Policy
Is the Iran War a manifestation of the rise of the Clash of Civilizations as a dominant attribute of current international politics? This conception of a civilizational clash seems relevant to the current war in the Middle East. A Christian-majority state and a Jewish state cooperate in a joint war against a country ruled by […]
Taiwan Is No Berlin – It’s More Important for US Deterrence
What is Taiwan to the United States? Is the security of that beleaguered island a peripheral issue for the US, in which the stakes would be too low to risk nuclear escalation in a fight with China? Or does the defense of Taiwan bear directly on the American way of life? The answers to these […]
